This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/70319] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sso/q2.c -O1 -fno-inline execution test
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:41:03 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/70319] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sso/q2.c -O1 -fno-inline execution test
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-70319-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70319
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Comment #1 was incorrect about the problem starting in r233398. It was my
> bswap pattern addition in r233414 that introduced the problem. On the other
> hand, I looked at the bswapdi operation in gdb and it seems correct.
The problem in .final is:
(insn 21 20 22 (set (reg:DI 19 %r19 [orig:97 B1 ] [97])
(mem/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 30 %r30)
(const_int -128 [0xffffffffffffff80])) [1 B1+0 S8 A128]))
q2.c:51 128 {*pa.md:4152}
(expr_list:REG_EQUIV (mem/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 30 %r30)
(const_int -128 [0xffffffffffffff80])) [1 B1+0 S8 A128])
(nil)))
(insn 22 21 23 (set (reg:DI 28 %r28 [96])
(bswap:DI (reg:DI 19 %r19 [orig:97 B1 ] [97]))) q2.c:51 47 {bswapdi2}
(nil))
[...]
(insn 35 33 36 (set (reg:DI 28 %r28 [105])
(bswap:DI (reg:DI 19 %r19 [orig:106 B1 ] [106]))) q2.c:51 47 {bswapdi2}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 19 %r19 [orig:106 B1 ] [106])
(nil)))
Now the bswapdi2 pattern clobbers %r19.