This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/67278] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed on darwin 14.5 x86_64


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278

--- Comment #8 from UroÅ Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to rguenther@suse.de from comment #6)
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278
> > 
> > --- Comment #5 from UroÅ Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> > > CCing Uros for the followup ICE.  Apply
> > 
> > Following patch should fix the ICE:
> > 
> > --cut here--
> > Index: config/i386/i386.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- config/i386/i386.c  (revision 233864)
> > +++ config/i386/i386.c  (working copy)
> > @@ -7794,6 +7794,10 @@ type_natural_mode (const_tree type, const CUMULATI
> >         {
> >           machine_mode innermode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (type));
> > 
> > +         /* There are no XFmode vector modes.  */
> > +         if (innermode == XFmode)
> > +           return mode;
> > +
> 
> Are there TFmode vector modes?  Yes, insn-modes.h says so at least.
> No V1<float>modes there though, just V1<int>modes.

Yes, vector TFmodes are present, and they work OK.

> Will you test this or shall I?

The patch was bootstrapped and regression tested, together with your patch. So,
I'd say it is ready to be applied.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]