This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/67278] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed on darwin 14.5 x86_64
- From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:21:27 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/67278] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed on darwin 14.5 x86_64
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-67278-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278
--- Comment #8 from UroÅ Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to rguenther@suse.de from comment #6)
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278
> >
> > --- Comment #5 from UroÅ Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> > > CCing Uros for the followup ICE. Apply
> >
> > Following patch should fix the ICE:
> >
> > --cut here--
> > Index: config/i386/i386.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- config/i386/i386.c (revision 233864)
> > +++ config/i386/i386.c (working copy)
> > @@ -7794,6 +7794,10 @@ type_natural_mode (const_tree type, const CUMULATI
> > {
> > machine_mode innermode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (type));
> >
> > + /* There are no XFmode vector modes. */
> > + if (innermode == XFmode)
> > + return mode;
> > +
>
> Are there TFmode vector modes? Yes, insn-modes.h says so at least.
> No V1<float>modes there though, just V1<int>modes.
Yes, vector TFmodes are present, and they work OK.
> Will you test this or shall I?
The patch was bootstrapped and regression tested, together with your patch. So,
I'd say it is ready to be applied.