This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:18:56 +0000
Subject: [Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?
Auto-submitted: auto-generated
References: <bug-69671-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69671

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hjl.tools at gmail dot com

--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 69676 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

References:
- [Bug target/69671] New: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?
  - From: jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?