This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug preprocessor/69177] [6 Regression] Bit-packing optimization makes it too easy to have location_t >= LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69177

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Because the new number of lines before columns are lost are way too small for
lots of larger sources.
Having half as many lines or so before we trigger the column loss is IMHO
acceptable, hitting it 32 times earlier is just too much.  I agree with Richi
on this.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]