This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/68543] [AArch64] Implement overflow arithmetic standard names {u,}{add,sub,mul}v4<mode> and/or negv3<mode>


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543

--- Comment #2 from Michael Collison <michael.collison at linaro dot org> ---
Great idea I will look into this.

On 12/10/2015 4:02 AM, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
>
> --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Maybe we can avoid defining custom expanders if we define
> WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS for aarch64.
> It's defined for arm and the documentation hints that it should be true for
> most RISC targets.
>
> Then the default fallback codegen for the given example is much improved:
> foo:
>          uxth    x0, w0
>          uxth    x1, w1
>          mul     x0, x0, x1
>          cmp     x0, x0, sxtw
>          bne     .L10
>          ret
> .L10:
>          stp     x29, x30, [sp, -16]!
>          add     x29, sp, 0
>          bl      abort
>
>
> However, we need to investigate the other codegen effects that come with
> WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS, in particular to make sure that the aarch64 patterns
> cope with the slightly different strategies of using subregs and sign/zero
> extends in combine
>

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]