This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ipa/66004] [6 Regression]: performance of 26_numerics/random/negative_binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc
- From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 03:19:34 +0000
- Subject: [Bug ipa/66004] [6 Regression]: performance of 26_numerics/random/negative_binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-66004-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> HP, I think I need bit more analysis here. Do you know what inline decision
> actually causes the trouble?
Um, no. I have barely even tracked regression, much less got around to a
useful investigation of what in r66004 caused the regression. I usually have a
build tree around and can do the typing if you tell what dump-file or somesuch
you want?
(Though I'm not sure that it's just the single test-file; I should verify that
first.)
While I'm here, let me log recent results. Not getting better. :-(
r231343: 42688158156