This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/67625] [4.9/5 Regression] some constexpr expressions rejected as enumerator value
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:52:13 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/67625] [4.9/5 Regression] some constexpr expressions rejected as enumerator value
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-67625-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67625
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[5 Regression] some |[4.9/5 Regression] some
|constexpr expressions |constexpr expressions
|rejected as enumerator |rejected as enumerator
|value |value
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This regressed with my r207924, and got fixed with r230365 (aka delayed folding
merge).
Jason, any ideas about this? Of course delayed folding is not backportable.