[Bug fortran/68544] New: ICE trying to pass derived type constructor as a function

["jim.macarthur at codethink dot co.uk" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68544

            Bug ID: 68544
           Summary: ICE trying to pass derived type constructor as a
                    function
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jim.macarthur at codethink dot co.uk
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 36839
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36839&action=edit
Minimal test case

The attached code causes an internal compiler error with the latest source from
git master (commit 9c822ac) and 5.2.0. It attempts to pass the implicit
constructor for a derived type as an argument to a subroutine.

I don't know if this is valid code. I haven't found anything in the standards
which suggest either way yet. Sun's F90 compiler rejects it, but gives a useful
error message.

gfortran -v:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/jimmacarthur/gcc-5.2.0/gccinstall/bin/gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/jimmacarthur/gcc-5.2.0/gccinstall/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.2.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-5.2.0/configure --with-languages=fortran
--prefix=/home/jimmacarthur/gcc-5.2.0/gccinstall --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.2.0 (GCC) 

Compiler command line:
~/gcc-5.2.0/gccinstall/bin/gfortran -Wall -Wextra
pass-type-constructor-as-function.f

output:
pass-type-constructor-as-function.f:1:23:

       SUBROUTINE sub (f)
                       1
Warning: Unused dummy argument âfâ at (1) [-Wunused-dummy-argument]
pass-type-constructor-as-function.f:7:0:

       TYPE t
 1
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xa20cdf crash_signal
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/toplev.c:383
0x67b990 gfc_sym_identifier
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:347
0x67c38a build_function_decl
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:2057
0x682fa5 gfc_get_symbol_decl(gfc_symbol*)
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:1487
0x693537 gfc_conv_variable
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:2312
0x690c8a gfc_conv_expr(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*)
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:7219
0x696048 gfc_conv_expr_reference(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*)
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:7319
0x68d3ff gfc_conv_procedure_call(gfc_se*, gfc_symbol*, gfc_actual_arglist*,
gfc_expr*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>*)
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:4831
0x6be024 gfc_trans_call(gfc_code*, bool, tree_node*, tree_node*, bool)
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c:419
0x66539c trans_code
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans.c:1743
0x685e54 gfc_generate_function_code(gfc_namespace*)
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:5841
0x622648 translate_all_program_units
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/parse.c:5340
0x622648 gfc_parse_file()
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/parse.c:5537
0x6613e5 gfc_be_parse_file
        ../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:229