This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
- From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:07:34 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-68486-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 07:48:19PM +0000, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
>
> --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > Not sure how the gcc/testsuite got on the end. Oh well, the
> > testcase won't hurt anything.
>
> [Book15] f90/bug% gfca /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90
> /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90:21:0:
>
> forall (i=1:n) y(i)%a = x
>
>
> internal compiler error: in gfc_do_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:3130
>
> without your fix for pr68227.
>
Of course. As I stated, it won't hurt anything.
FAILs in the testsuite are not a problem. The
issue with EXPR_FUNCTION and cshift is a problem.