This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: <invalid tree code> >>>
- From: "gary at intrepid dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 01:55:52 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: <invalid tree code> >>>
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-68117-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117
--- Comment #36 from Gary Funck <gary at intrepid dot com> ---
(In reply to rguenther@suse.de from comment #35)
> Yes, I thought the cfgexpand.c place is a better one and the only one
> that would be related to the place where I removed the old
> redirect_edge_var_map_destroy call.
>
> Hmm. Maybe not for functions removed by cgraph code.
>
> Does
> [... patch ..]
> help? (without the comment #29 patch)
>
> Does the patch in comment #25 help?
It is getting a bit confusing. Can you post a single patch to a given trunk
reviiosn?