This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/53796] I/O INQUIRE of RECL: If not specified in OPEN, the default value should be returned (sequential access)
- From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:57:32 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/53796] I/O INQUIRE of RECL: If not specified in OPEN, the default value should be returned (sequential access)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53796-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> AFAICT it remains unfixed. GFortran development resources being what they are,
> not all bugs can be promptly fixed.
> But what's the rush to close old unfixed bugs anyway? "Number of open bugs"
> is a ridiculous metric for software quality, especially if one then closes
> unfixed bugs in some kind of effort to boost said metric.
Well, I just moved the PR from UNCONFIRMED to WAITING. I am fine about moving
it from WAITING to NEW.
However, I don't see the point to keep open PRs about dubious enhancement that
will never be considered for the next decades.