This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171

--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andre Vehreschild from comment #4)
> Hi Paul,
> 
> please compare:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00033.html
> 
> to your fix. Sounds like we are doing the same.
> 
> - Andre
> 
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:13:55 +0000
> "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
> > 
> > Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> > 
> >            What    |Removed                     |Added
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >            Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
> > 
> > --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > The bug arises because array sections are marked as DECL_ARTIFICIAL and so the
> > offending SOURCE expression produces a temporary variable, whose offset is out
> > of kilter, being zero. The most economical solution, in terms of effort, is
> > simply to suppress the creation of the temporary, when the source is a
> > variable. This is regtesting right now. Alternatively, the array descriptor
> > could be converted to unity based indexes, with the appropriate offset.
> > 
> > I'll take it.
> > 
> > Paul
> >

Hi Andre,

That's not the same PR is it?

Cheers

Paul


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]