This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/67716] [5] [SH]: Miscompiles libraw: Assembler: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716

--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #13)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #12)
> > Maybe we should move some
> > more of the sh_option_override things sh_override_options_after_change?  I
> > don't know ...
> 
> I thought the same thing too.  From the implementations for other targets,
> the align related flags are enough, I guess.  I could be wrong, though.

Yes, there are issues.  I've created PR 67723.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]