This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/67386] missing diagnostic on a use of an undeclared function


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67386

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As noted in the discussion, the GCC behavior in the Description of this bug
matches the intent (if not the words) of the C90 standard.  Any change here
would only serve to break existing programs that rely on it.  Closing as
invalid.  (Adding a test to exercise this behavior might be worthwhile.)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]