This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug lto/53730] exception handling broken - lto and static standard libs


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53730

Matt Godbolt <matt at godbolt dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |matt at godbolt dot org

--- Comment #4 from Matt Godbolt <matt at godbolt dot org> ---
Having just built a shiny new 5.1.0 out of the box, I'm seeing the same issue
as this, using gold. I used an in-tree build of binutils (2.24) if that helps.

I didn't have to rebuild gcc, I just didn't supply "-fuse-ld=gold" and all
worked.  Given that gold is so much more awesome than ld in terms of speed, is
this a bug to file against gold or gcc? I see the status of this bug is
"resolved moved" but I can't see where it was moved to!


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]