This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/65840] type of result of at least some libstdc++ xmethods is different than real operator
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 22:57:01 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/65840] type of result of at least some libstdc++ xmethods is different than real operator
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-65840-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65840
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Well does this matter in practice? In does set "*p = 1" work when xm is
disable and when it is enable? If the behavior is the same then it does not
matter in practice.
Or does p &*p work both with and without xmethod?