This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076

Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com

--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks, Richard. I will take a look for the bootstrap ICE.  Running one extra
local pure-const should be cheap enough and dropping large regions of EH code
seems like a win.

Concering the inline decision difference, perhaps you can have more insight. I
typically use tramp3d as a black box to test heuristic changes - it is almost
impossible for me to figure out why inlining decisions went wrong on this beast
;))

Why exactly does chkp pass can not run as part of early opts?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]