This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/65078] [5 Regression] 4.9 and 5.0 generate more spill-fill in comparison with 4.8.2


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |glisse at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, I have managed to reproduce it, but only if it is preprocessed with each
compiler separately.  Seems it is the _mm_storel_epi64 change from r217608 that
matters here, if I use the pre-r217608 content of that inline function, I get
25 %esp references with all compilers I've tried, with r217608 or later
_mm_storel_epi64 I get 75 %esp references even with 4.8.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]