This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/65153] [SH][4.9 Regression] "insn does not satisfy its constraints" when compiling libmcrypt
- From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 22:30:46 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/65153] [SH][4.9 Regression] "insn does not satisfy its constraints" when compiling libmcrypt
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-65153-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #8)
>
> I've tried to disable the peephole on trunk and compared CSiBE results. It
> seems the peephole doesn't hit very often:
> sum: 3371887 -> 3371943 +56 / +0.001661 %
>
> So we could probably remove the complex peephole without a big loss.
>
> I have a set of similar but simpler peepholes with a higher hit rate. Maybe
> we can replace the complex peephole with some simpler ones.
The set of peepholes can be found in PR 61142, attachment 34839.
CSiBE numbers with that patch:
sum: 3371887 -> 3367967 -3920 / -0.116255 %
avg: -217.777778 / -0.167780 %
max: replaypc-0.4.0.preproc 57212 -> 57188 -24 / -0.041949 %
min: mpeg2dec-0.3.1 54348 -> 53984 -364 / -0.669758 %
and with the patch, but without the problematic peephole of this PR:
sum: 3371887 -> 3367983 -3904 / -0.115781 %
avg: -216.888889 / -0.167686 %
max: replaypc-0.4.0.preproc 57212 -> 57188 -24 / -0.041949 %
min: mpeg2dec-0.3.1 54348 -> 53984 -364 / -0.669758 %
It seems that the other set of peepholes covers most of the cases of the
complex peephole.