This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/65064] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr60115.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
- From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 02:02:59 +0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/65064] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr60115.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-65064-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
Does -fno-common fix the problem? If it is the case, we need to
treat common symbol differently for ia64 since
.common b#,8,4
.common a#,4,4
won't be placed in small data section reachable via GP reloc. The
problem for ia64 is even if a data symbol is defined locally, we
can't use GP reloc if it isn't placed in small data section.