This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581
- From: "tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:27:13 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-64326-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326
--- Comment #5 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> make_forwarder_block is definitely wrong on not capping. But I do not see
> how vectorizing can get us to a frequncy over FREQ_MAX? So probably some
> earlier bug in there too
ok, I'll send a patch adding capping to make_forwarder_block. That's enough to
make the testcase not ICE for me, do we care about trying to find the other bug
assuming there is one? or does it make more sense to just hope it goes away
when more frequency stuff uses sreal?