This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
- From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:03:01 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-64368-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[5 Regression] Several |[5 Regression] Several
|libstdc++ test failures on |libstdc++ test failures on
|darwin and others after |non-linux platforms after
|r218964. |r218964.
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> I've just confirmed that r218964 is also the cuprit for the
> (considerably smaller) set of 64-bit testsuite failures seen
> on Solaris (both SPARC and x86):
Some are also seen on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg02304.html:
FAIL: 22_locale/conversions/string/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/2.cc
(test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/4.cc
(test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/typedefs.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/requirements/standard_layout.cc (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: experimental/feat-cxx14.cc (test for excess errors)
Note that the last failures belong to another PR: they come from a later commit
and I see several of them on darwin (see FX tests). I have no inclination to
open a PR for them as long as the PRs I open are rotting for ever.