This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/61047] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux
- From: "zsojka at seznam dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:37:12 +0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/61047] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-61047-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61047
--- Comment #15 from Zdenek Sojka <zsojka at seznam dot cz> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9)
> Not worth fixing until we have a bug report for real-life software.
So do you prefer leaving the bug in until it hits a real-life software?
Is this a common opinion among the GCC dev team, or does it apply only to this
particular case?