This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others after r218964.
- From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:48:36 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others after r218964.
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-64368-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34344
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34344&action=edit
Call-trace for testsuite/22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc on cris-elf, a "newlib
target"
Plain execution trace from 22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc compiled with default
testsuite options, so inlining and whatever effects apply.
In the trace, lines with ">" denotes function calls, "<" are returns, with
indentation supposed to show the call-level. The first four columns are the
hexadecimal values of the first four parameters as applicable (actually,
"parameter registers" but none are larger than 32 bits here, so same thing) /
ditto return values, padded with random contents. (The fifth column is
cumulative execution times at each call-level.)
By a quick glance it seems the freed-but-not-allocated pointer, 0x5e23a, is
also the argument to the last call to strlen.
HTH.