This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/64039] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 28;"
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:04:11 +0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/64039] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 28;"
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-64039-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64039
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2014-11-24
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Summary|FAIL: |[5 Regression] FAIL:
|gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse |gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse
|-2.c scan-tree-dump |-2.c scan-tree-dump
|optimized "return 28;" |optimized "return 28;"
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
a = *L$C0000;
ok, so PA has a similar issue as aarch64 (PR63679), I suppose for those
targets we need to XFAIL the test (it's a known missed-optimization tracked
in that PR).
I'll take care of this.