This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958

davem at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |davem at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you contribute something other than a knee-jerk reactionary posting of that
submission rules URL?

Those requirements are entirely impractical.  I checked things in directly to
the gcc repo because a sparc gcc-4.9 build failure persisted for 9 months,
which is proof that this proceedure for sanitizer development is completely not
tenable.

A sanitizer developer was CC:'d on the gcc bugzilla in question, and I even
posted a working version of that developers patch and attached it to that bug. 
Nothing was done for 4 months after that.

After consulting with Richard Henderson I just checked it in.

And I will continue to do the same in the future, I apologize in advance if
fixing the build in gcc after waiting for upstream to do something about it for
months upsets you.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]