This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/63657] [4.9/5 regression] -Wunused-variable: warning supressed by virtual dtor


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657

petschy at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |---

--- Comment #5 from petschy at gmail dot com ---
To further prove my case, here is the disassembly of foo() and bar(). As
expected, they are identical, no ctors/dtors are ever called, so there can be
no side effects.

Dump of assembler code for function foo():
   0x0000000000400766 <+0>:     push   %rbp
   0x0000000000400767 <+1>:     mov    %rsp,%rbp
   0x000000000040076a <+4>:     sub    $0x10,%rsp
   0x000000000040076e <+8>:     callq  0x400797 <getfoo()>
   0x0000000000400773 <+13>:    mov    %rax,-0x8(%rbp)
   0x0000000000400777 <+17>:    leaveq 
   0x0000000000400778 <+18>:    retq   
End of assembler dump.

Dump of assembler code for function bar():
   0x0000000000400779 <+0>:     push   %rbp
   0x000000000040077a <+1>:     mov    %rsp,%rbp
   0x000000000040077d <+4>:     sub    $0x10,%rsp
   0x0000000000400781 <+8>:     callq  0x4007a2 <getbar()>
   0x0000000000400786 <+13>:    mov    %rax,-0x8(%rbp)
   0x000000000040078a <+17>:    leaveq 
   0x000000000040078b <+18>:    retq   
End of assembler dump.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]