[Bug middle-end/63518] New: missing Wuninitialized warning independent of order of arguments

["manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63518

            Bug ID: 63518
           Summary: missing Wuninitialized warning independent of order of
                    arguments
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: manu at gcc dot gnu.org

typedef int Timeout;

void wait(Timeout, bool);

void wait2(Timeout, bool);

bool setTimeout(Timeout &t)
{
  t = 5;
  return true;
}

void foo(void)
{
  Timeout t;
   wait(t, setTimeout(t));
}


void bar(void)
{
  Timeout t;
   wait2(setTimeout(t),t);
}

At least one of the both variants should give a warning. Ideally, both should.

Clang warns for the first variant.