This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/62100] c++11 threads invoke pure virtual function on arm embedded system


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62100

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |UNCONFIRMED
     Ever confirmed|1                           |0

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Peter A. Bigot from comment #4)
> But one difference is that I'm using -std=c++1y (and sometimes -std=c++11). 
> Would that be enough to be an ABI change?

No, it shouldn't be (if it is then it's a bug that needs to be fixed).

I agree nothing looks suspicious in that output. If the separately-built
libstdc++ uses different configuration that would be a problem, but it's not
possible to tell from that output.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]