This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/61985] It's possible to declare a function pointer as noreturn using the old volatile syntax but not normally.


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61985

--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
I'm afraid I can't tell what you think the bug here is.  You make a true 
statement about C11 - that's not a bug report.  You give some C code - 
that's not a bug report either.  You don't say what GCC version or 
command-line options you use with the C code, or what you think GCC is 
doing wrong with that code, why you think that is wrong and what you think 
it should do instead.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]