This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/61748] imm-devirt-2.C failed on arm-linux


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61748

--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61748
> 
> --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> > --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > I have silenced the failure with the following patch
> >
> > --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/imm-devirt-2.C    2014-07-05
> > 23:22:52.000000000 +0200
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/imm-devirt-2.C    2014-07-06 18:03:59.000000000
> > +0200
> > @@ -92,5 +92,5 @@ int main (int argc, char *argv[])
> >  }
> >
> >  /* We fold into thunk of C. Eventually we should inline the thunk.  */
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "C::_ZThn24_N1C3fooEi (" "einline"  } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "C::_ZThn\(16|24\)_N1C3fooEi \\(" "einline"  }
> > } */
> >  /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "einline" } } */
> >
> > see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg00385.html.
> 
> Looks right to me, provided the 32/64-bit difference is expected.

Yes, this is OK

Honza

> 
>     Rainer
> 
> -- 
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]