This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug web/61782] always_inline incorrectly documented


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61782

--- Comment #2 from Daniel Santos <daniel.santos at pobox dot com> ---
Hmm, I suppose I wasn't considering that interpretation of the language. Your
clarification helps though, and actually sounds pretty good: "always_inline
forces inlining of the function under all circumstances and it is an error if
the function cannot be inlined."

I know that I am not the only person who has read the original language and
interpreted it as marking the function inline-able, even if if inlining
(-finline-functions) isn't enabled, yet still subject to other considerations
for a determination as to rather or not the function body is actually inlined,
(i.e., the inline insn count).

So can we get some clarification similar to the language you used above?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]