This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/61153] [ARM] vbic vorn tests fail


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61153

--- Comment #6 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #4)
> Yes that is expected as per my original patch submission. Patch 1/3 said
> these tests would fail because at O0 combine doesn't run.

Indeed, sorry I forgot about it.

> I'm expecting your run time tests to go in and for cases where we need them,
> we may want to put out some kind of basic scan assembler tests for them.
> 
> I'm tempted to mark this as invalid.
> 

How do we define "cases where we need them"? My concern is that some compiler
change might cause a suboptimal-yet-functional code to be generated, and we
wouldn't notice it.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]