This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/59778] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c
- From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 01:02:36 +0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/59778] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-59778-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59778
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|target |testsuite
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I tend to think the failure of this test on hppa is mainly a
testsuite issue. Specifically, the test performs operations that may
raise exceptions and the result of these operations are tested:
LHSTYPE r = (PRE var_##NAME POST); \
int rexc = fetestexcept (TEST_ALL_EXCEPT); \
if (VALTEST1 (r)) \
The PA-RISC 2.0 Architecture states that the destination is undefined
except in the case when it is one of the source registers for invalid
and divide by zero. It also appears based on my testing that the results
are not as expected by the test for overflow, underflow and inexact
operations.