This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/60811] arc/arc.c:2135: possible bad argument to abs
- From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:44:58 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/60811] arc/arc.c:2135: possible bad argument to abs
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-60811-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60811
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #1)
> Though it seems too insignificant to make a change that late
> in phase 3, so I think this should wait for 4.10.
Seems reasonable to me, but at worst, it's only going to break
one architecture and I think I'm right in saying arc isn't a
primary or secondary architecture.
> Although such a small straightforward bug-fix can hardly considered
> Copyrightable, I suppose you are technically the author of a patch, so
> it would be SOP to name you in the ChangeLog - unless you don't want that.
But I haven't written a patch, I've only reported a bug with a suggested
solution.
I think who fixes it gets to put their name on the record, not me.