This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "<built-in>", in both warnings and dumps
- From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:11:14 +0000
- Subject: [Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "<built-in>", in both warnings and dumps
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-60761-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761
--- Comment #7 from Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
>
> does former_clone_of apply recursively? Thus can we have a clone of a clone?
> Is there a way to "pretty-print" the kind of clone? That is, say
> <clone with foo = 1> for a ipa-cp clone with parameter foo replaced by 1?
Why would you want to do that? At least for diagnostics to the users (not debug
dumps), that the function is a clone is an internal implementation detail.