This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/60657] [4.9 Regression] ICE: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657

--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
While the improved predicates make the first IN_RANGE tests unneeded, IMHO it
should still verify what the second IN_RANGE tests did, i.e. that operands[2]
is not 0 and at most 32 - third operand.  I think the combiner just blindly
tries to match and simplify, all the verification is performed through trying
to recog the insn.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]