This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case
- From: "rouson at stanford dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:51:42 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-59654-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654
--- Comment #20 from Damian Rouson <rouson at stanford dot edu> ---
FYI, the current port of gcc49 via macports is broken
(https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41964) so I think Tomâs only choice will be
to build from source or build on another platform unless the port gets fixed.
Damian
On Jan 2, 2014, at 1:59 PM, janus at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654
>
> --- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to tlcclt from comment #18)
>> I usually just use mac port these days
>
> Apparently MacPorts does have GCC trunk snapshots. Tbe current one is from
> 2013-12-29 and I think they are updated weekly, so you might have to wait a few
> days.
>
>
>> With regard to the back port in 4.8, would that appear only in 4.8.3? Or
>> would it possibly also go into 4.8.2/4.8.1.
>
> No, 4.8.1 and 4.8.2 have been released already. The fix would go into the
> upcoming 4.8.3.
>
>
>> Thank you so much for such a speedy resolution.
>
> Thanks for the bug report!
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.