This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[OOP] Broken function table |[4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP]
                   |with complex OO use case    |Broken function table with
                   |                            |complex OO use case

--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm marking this PR as a regression, due to the fact that both comment 9 and
comment 11 work with 4.7, but fail with 4.8 upwards.

However, I'm not sure if 4.7 works reliably or if it is just a coincidence due
to the Heisenbuggy nature of this bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]