This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
- From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 12:40:19 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-54221-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2013-12-29
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> I mark this now as regression in the Fortran front-end to keep better track
> of PR middle-end/54224: It seems as if part of the fix has to be done
> in the Fortran front-end.
>
> In this PR, the issue of having a different result with PRIVATE vs.
> "PRIVATE :: entry_name" is now fixed.
I don't see the point to keep this PR open in addition of pr54224 (only one
issue left AFAIU). Also I don't think this is any longer a regression.