This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/59413] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:49:39 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/59413] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-59413-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59413
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, my fault then, terribly sorry, I've simplified the testcase a little bit
(removed the typedef and used unsigned int instead). Apparently for the
reproduction it is important that the c variable uses some typedef to unsigned
int rather than that type directly.