This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This started failing when the assertion has been added:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01265.html
There is no code to ensure that it won't happen though.
So, either the verification patch should be reverted and SRA adjusted to cope
with this, or something in gimple-expr.[ch] ? will need to be adjusted to
reject it (but e.g. making is_gimple_addressable more expensive might be a
problem).


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]