This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/59332] Segmentation fault in inline_summary with LTO + attribute optimize


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59332

--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> ---
It was discovered by accident. However, if it does work, why "no-lto" (which is
so much more useful) should not work?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]