This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/59223] New: -Wmaybe-uninitialized and -Wuninitialized relationships


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59223

            Bug ID: 59223
           Summary: -Wmaybe-uninitialized and -Wuninitialized
                    relationships
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net

With:
* gcc-4.8 (Debian 4.8.2-5) 4.8.2
* gcc (Debian 20131021-1) 4.9.0 20131021 (experimental) [trunk revision 203899]

It seems that -Wmaybe-uninitialized works only if -Wuninitialized is enabled.
Moreover -Wmaybe-uninitialized is enabled by -Wuninitialized. I wonder whether
this is intended or something is missing in the man page (the gcc 4.8.2 one
doesn't say anything about these relationships).

xvii:~> cat tst2.c
int foo (int x)
{
  int y;
  if (x == 0)
    y = 1;
  else if (x == 1)
    y = 2;
  return y;
}

First test:

xvii:~> gcc-snapshot -O2 -Wmaybe-uninitialized -c tst2.c

No warning here; -Wuninitialized is needed to trigger the
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized] warning (see below).

Second test:

xvii:~> gcc-snapshot -O2 -Wuninitialized -c tst2.c
tst2.c: In function 'foo':
tst2.c:8:3: warning: 'y' may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
   return y;
   ^

The use of -Wuninitialized alone has enabled -Wmaybe-uninitialized.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]