This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/59034] [4.9 Regression] FAIL gcc.c-torture/compile/20031208-1.c
- From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:44:23 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/59034] [4.9 Regression] FAIL gcc.c-torture/compile/20031208-1.c
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-59034-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59034
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
The fix is obvious:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index c7ec0c1..a2c81e5 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@
split_double_mode (DImode, &operands[1], 1, &operands[2], &operands[3]);
operands[1] = gen_lowpart (DImode, operands[2]);
- operands[2] = gen_rtx_MEM (SImode, gen_rtx_PLUS (DImode, stack_pointer_rtx,
+ operands[2] = gen_rtx_MEM (SImode, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
GEN_INT (4)));
})
@@ -1686,7 +1686,7 @@
split_double_mode (DImode, &operands[1], 1, &operands[2], &operands[3]);
operands[1] = gen_lowpart (DImode, operands[2]);
- operands[2] = gen_rtx_MEM (SImode, gen_rtx_PLUS (DImode, stack_pointer_rtx,
+ operands[2] = gen_rtx_MEM (SImode, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
GEN_INT (4)));
})
I am testing it now.