[Bug libgomp/58642] gomp regression: not "honoring" anymore task set and numactl

["jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58642

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-10-07
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 30964
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30964&action=edit
gomp-pr58642.patch

Can you please try this patch?  From the above it seems there is no easy way to
find out what is the minimum size to make pthread_getaffinity_np pass, on the
other side it should be fine to pass smaller size to pthread_setaffinity_np.
So, what the patch tries to do is if the initial pthread_getaffinity_np failed
with EINVAL, it will retry with larger sizes, and, once it succeeds, tries to
find out the required minimum size that covers all the currently available
CPUs.
The minimum size for successful pthread_getaffinity_np will then be used for
further pthread_getaffinity_np calls, while gomp_cpuset_size will be used for
the places bitmasks and pthread_setaffinity_np calls.