This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/58385] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] likely wrong code bug
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:35:53 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/58385] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] likely wrong code bug
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-58385-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58385
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 11 11:35:51 2013
New Revision: 202494
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58385
* fold-const.c (build_range_check): If both low and high are NULL,
use omit_one_operand_loc to preserve exp side-effects.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr58385.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr58385.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fold-const.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog