This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/58239] [4.9 regression] pretty-print.c:789: undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)'
- From: "gdr at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 17:22:20 +0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/58239] [4.9 regression] pretty-print.c:789: undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)'
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-58239-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239
--- Comment #2 from Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK, I see the emitted reference to 'operator delete', and I suspect I
have an idea of why the compiler generated this reference even though
it isn't used anywhere in the input source code.
Why are we linking gnatlink with xgcc and not with xg++ -nostdc++?