This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/57748] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on ARM with -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748

--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #5)
> expand_assignment, offset as filled in get_inner_reference is the same,
> however get_object_alignment (tem) used to return 64, and now only returns
> 32 which then pushes us the wrong path which does not handle this case.  So
> now I guess I should figure out why get_object_alignment thinks the
> alignment is so small...

hhmm..

set_ptr_info_alignment is always called with align=4,
and by the way, the crash goes away if I change this line
(but I cannot tell if the code is correct):

--- builtins.c.jj       2013-07-06 11:34:17.000000000 +0200
+++ builtins.c  2013-07-29 21:50:56.000000000 +0200
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ get_pointer_alignment_1 (tree exp, unsig
          *bitposp = ptr_misalign * BITS_PER_UNIT;
          *alignp = ptr_align * BITS_PER_UNIT;
          /* We cannot really tell whether this result is an approximation.  */
-         return true;
+         return false;
        }
       else
        {


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]