This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/57053] inaccurate message for ambiguous calls when in fact there is not valid candidate


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57053

Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-04-24
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-24 07:49:59 UTC ---
I think you are right. There are also other issues with this output: printing
foo(int) as you say is not very helpful, the use of error: for explanatory
notes, and what is "near match"?

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]